<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Power Awareness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chipdesignmag.com/lpd/mutschler/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chipdesignmag.com/lpd/mutschler</link>
	<description>Making Semiconductor Architectures More Efficient</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 18:37:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Connecting IP Blocks by David Murray</title>
		<link>http://chipdesignmag.com/lpd/mutschler/2010/10/07/connecting-ip-blocks/comment-page-1/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>David Murray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 18:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chipdesignmag.com/lpd/mutschler/?p=39#comment-74</guid>
		<description>IP-XACT doesn&#039;t have any standard provision for capturing power information.     The IPXACT technical committee has been reformed under Accellera recently and are going through a  rapid requirements gathering session so if anyone is interested in championing power extensions then...... get on to Accellera quickly!  I did an IPXACT survey recently and people thought that power extensions are an important part of the evolution of the standard.  It will be interesting to see how both UPF (Unified Power Format) and IP-XACT will evolve as they are both under Accellera.--Dave Murray</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IP-XACT doesn&#8217;t have any standard provision for capturing power information.     The IPXACT technical committee has been reformed under Accellera recently and are going through a  rapid requirements gathering session so if anyone is interested in championing power extensions then&#8230;&#8230; get on to Accellera quickly!  I did an IPXACT survey recently and people thought that power extensions are an important part of the evolution of the standard.  It will be interesting to see how both UPF (Unified Power Format) and IP-XACT will evolve as they are both under Accellera.&#8211;Dave Murray</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Optimizing Physical IP For Applications And Processors by Raj Nair</title>
		<link>http://chipdesignmag.com/lpd/mutschler/2010/05/13/optimizing-physical-ip-for-applications-and-processors/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Raj Nair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 19:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chipdesignmag.com/lpd/mutschler/?p=15#comment-12</guid>
		<description>If it&#039;s all about power, then it&#039;s very much the operating voltage... a fundamental means to reduced power is lowered voltage. Just as clock-gating is a means to bring average clock frequency down, for a linear benefit in P=CV^2f, power gating, common in SoC&#039;s today, brings the average operating voltage down, gaining quadratically in power. Bringing the nominal operating voltage down while maintaining performance requires careful attention to POWER INTEGRITY... this is the next critical design challenge that impacts chip resource and physical IP optimization. 

A book on this topic: http://www.informit.com/title/9780137011223</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it&#8217;s all about power, then it&#8217;s very much the operating voltage&#8230; a fundamental means to reduced power is lowered voltage. Just as clock-gating is a means to bring average clock frequency down, for a linear benefit in P=CV^2f, power gating, common in SoC&#8217;s today, brings the average operating voltage down, gaining quadratically in power. Bringing the nominal operating voltage down while maintaining performance requires careful attention to POWER INTEGRITY&#8230; this is the next critical design challenge that impacts chip resource and physical IP optimization. </p>
<p>A book on this topic: <a href="http://www.informit.com/title/9780137011223" rel="nofollow">http://www.informit.com/title/9780137011223</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New x86 Technology For The Datacenter? by Power Awareness &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Optimizing Physical IP For Applications And Processors</title>
		<link>http://chipdesignmag.com/lpd/mutschler/2010/03/11/new-x86-technology-for-the-datacenter/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Power Awareness &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Optimizing Physical IP For Applications And Processors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 18:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chipdesignmag.com/lpd/mutschler/?p=9#comment-11</guid>
		<description>[...] a separate note, following up on my first post, it turns out that the &#8217;silicon innovation&#8217; referred to by IBM is the company&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a separate note, following up on my first post, it turns out that the &#8217;silicon innovation&#8217; referred to by IBM is the company&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

