<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Early Edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chipdesignmag.com/sld/craig/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chipdesignmag.com/sld/craig</link>
	<description>Deep Insights for Chip Architects and Engineers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:29:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Good Times, Good People by Earle</title>
		<link>http://chipdesignmag.com/sld/craig/2011/03/31/good-times-good-people/comment-page-1/#comment-531</link>
		<dc:creator>Earle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chipdesignmag.com/sld/craig/?p=106#comment-531</guid>
		<description>Rock on! All together or nothing , step up as one!

Earle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rock on! All together or nothing , step up as one!</p>
<p>Earle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Good Times, Good People by Shiv Sikand</title>
		<link>http://chipdesignmag.com/sld/craig/2011/03/31/good-times-good-people/comment-page-1/#comment-293</link>
		<dc:creator>Shiv Sikand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 18:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chipdesignmag.com/sld/craig/?p=106#comment-293</guid>
		<description>I first met Aaron in 1995 when working with Genashor Corp. on validating asynchronous circuits. He inspired me to work hard, to keep dreaming and surround yourself with smart people because they were the only ones who could keep you honest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I first met Aaron in 1995 when working with Genashor Corp. on validating asynchronous circuits. He inspired me to work hard, to keep dreaming and surround yourself with smart people because they were the only ones who could keep you honest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Good Times, Good People by Gary Gendel</title>
		<link>http://chipdesignmag.com/sld/craig/2011/03/31/good-times-good-people/comment-page-1/#comment-287</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Gendel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 15:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chipdesignmag.com/sld/craig/?p=106#comment-287</guid>
		<description>As someone that worked along side Aaron for 30 years straight I can truthfully say he was a wonderful and rare person.

Aaron would think things through before he wrote a line of code.  I remember him thinking and jotting notes for the fault simulator for about 2 months.  Then one day he decided he was ready and wrote the whole shebang in a week.  His code was impeccable and bugs were scarce.

I remember an incident when a MIMIC user ran the fault simulation for two days on a VAX 780 when it crashed. Since we didn&#039;t have security clearance, Aaron started asking questions about the design so the answers wouldn&#039;t contain any secrets.  After about 12 questions Aaron had identified the problem and fixed it. He also had them change the simulation parameters so the simulation would finish in 8 hours rather than the 10 days it would have with their settings.

He was well read and versed in many areas and was a member of the Columbia University Philosophy Club. Often I would be amazed at how insightful his understanding of a topic was. He loved to argue, but never lost his temper, no matter how hard he was pushed.

He was also good at bringing out the best in anyone. He taught me that there is nothing bad about failure as long as you learned from the experience.

I think the closest equivalent to the working environment we had at RCA would be today&#039;s &quot;skunk works&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone that worked along side Aaron for 30 years straight I can truthfully say he was a wonderful and rare person.</p>
<p>Aaron would think things through before he wrote a line of code.  I remember him thinking and jotting notes for the fault simulator for about 2 months.  Then one day he decided he was ready and wrote the whole shebang in a week.  His code was impeccable and bugs were scarce.</p>
<p>I remember an incident when a MIMIC user ran the fault simulation for two days on a VAX 780 when it crashed. Since we didn&#8217;t have security clearance, Aaron started asking questions about the design so the answers wouldn&#8217;t contain any secrets.  After about 12 questions Aaron had identified the problem and fixed it. He also had them change the simulation parameters so the simulation would finish in 8 hours rather than the 10 days it would have with their settings.</p>
<p>He was well read and versed in many areas and was a member of the Columbia University Philosophy Club. Often I would be amazed at how insightful his understanding of a topic was. He loved to argue, but never lost his temper, no matter how hard he was pushed.</p>
<p>He was also good at bringing out the best in anyone. He taught me that there is nothing bad about failure as long as you learned from the experience.</p>
<p>I think the closest equivalent to the working environment we had at RCA would be today&#8217;s &#8220;skunk works&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Good Times, Good People by Rick Stanton</title>
		<link>http://chipdesignmag.com/sld/craig/2011/03/31/good-times-good-people/comment-page-1/#comment-286</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Stanton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 15:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chipdesignmag.com/sld/craig/?p=106#comment-286</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always been amazed by the high quality of people that were part of the RCA team back in the day. Some of my best friends, industry mentors and people who always make me smile came from that group. Aaron was certainly a man who enriched all of those who knew him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always been amazed by the high quality of people that were part of the RCA team back in the day. Some of my best friends, industry mentors and people who always make me smile came from that group. Aaron was certainly a man who enriched all of those who knew him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Reaching The Breaking Point by Welcome to EDACafe - What's PR got to do with it?</title>
		<link>http://chipdesignmag.com/sld/craig/2010/12/16/reaching-the-breaking-point/comment-page-1/#comment-263</link>
		<dc:creator>Welcome to EDACafe - What's PR got to do with it?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 05:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chipdesignmag.com/sld/craig/?p=75#comment-263</guid>
		<description>[...] Ron, I was shocked to see, in the survey you conducted, that 94% of designers have timing constraint problems that could stop their current [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ron, I was shocked to see, in the survey you conducted, that 94% of designers have timing constraint problems that could stop their current [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Reaching The Breaking Point by System-Level Design &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Blog Review: Dec. 22</title>
		<link>http://chipdesignmag.com/sld/craig/2010/12/16/reaching-the-breaking-point/comment-page-1/#comment-260</link>
		<dc:creator>System-Level Design &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Blog Review: Dec. 22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 16:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chipdesignmag.com/sld/craig/?p=75#comment-260</guid>
		<description>[...] Ron Craig examines why it’s so hard to sell good tools to customers who need [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ron Craig examines why it’s so hard to sell good tools to customers who need [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Getting Some Respect by System-Level Design &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Blog Review: Nov. 24</title>
		<link>http://chipdesignmag.com/sld/craig/2010/11/18/getting-some-respect/comment-page-1/#comment-251</link>
		<dc:creator>System-Level Design &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Blog Review: Nov. 24</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 16:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chipdesignmag.com/sld/craig/?p=65#comment-251</guid>
		<description>[...] Mike Gianfagna talks about respect for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mike Gianfagna talks about respect for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Should EDA Remain Coin-Operated? by System-Level Design &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Blog Review: Oct. 27</title>
		<link>http://chipdesignmag.com/sld/craig/2010/10/21/should-eda-remain-coin-operated/comment-page-1/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>System-Level Design &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Blog Review: Oct. 27</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 12:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chipdesignmag.com/sld/craig/?p=56#comment-121</guid>
		<description>[...] Mike Gianfagna looks at whether the EDA business model is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mike Gianfagna looks at whether the EDA business model is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why The Early Edition Was Late by System-Level Design &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Blog Review: Sept. 29</title>
		<link>http://chipdesignmag.com/sld/craig/2010/09/23/why-the-early-edition-was-late/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>System-Level Design &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Blog Review: Sept. 29</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chipdesignmag.com/sld/craig/?p=45#comment-43</guid>
		<description>[...] Mike Gianfagna looks at the economics of tools and why EDA doesn’t always get its full value for the investment [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mike Gianfagna looks at the economics of tools and why EDA doesn’t always get its full value for the investment [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What EDA360 Isn’t by Gary Stringham</title>
		<link>http://chipdesignmag.com/sld/craig/2010/07/22/what-eda360-isn%e2%80%99t/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Stringham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 16:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chipdesignmag.com/sld/craig/?p=21#comment-23</guid>
		<description>I, too, have read the EDA360 paper and liked its software-driven approach. I am an electrical engineer by degree but have been doing software most of my career. I have been frustrated when writing a device driver for a block that was cast in concrete. I had to contort myself to whatever the block presented. So I took it upon myself to talk with the hw engineers early on and was able to make significant changes to the hw design. In fact, in one case, a device driver took over a year to complete on one version of the block. I worked with the hw engineer to fix the problems and on the next version, I had the driver running in three days. I&#039;m a firm believer that sw should dictate hw design. But that is a nice platitude because the development cycle of hw is much longer than sw. In order for sw to dictate hw design, sw engineers have to be involved early on even though it will be months before they have real hw to run on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, too, have read the EDA360 paper and liked its software-driven approach. I am an electrical engineer by degree but have been doing software most of my career. I have been frustrated when writing a device driver for a block that was cast in concrete. I had to contort myself to whatever the block presented. So I took it upon myself to talk with the hw engineers early on and was able to make significant changes to the hw design. In fact, in one case, a device driver took over a year to complete on one version of the block. I worked with the hw engineer to fix the problems and on the next version, I had the driver running in three days. I&#8217;m a firm believer that sw should dictate hw design. But that is a nice platitude because the development cycle of hw is much longer than sw. In order for sw to dictate hw design, sw engineers have to be involved early on even though it will be months before they have real hw to run on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

